BS 9999 Automatic sprinkler design compensation benefits
This article was originally published as part of The impact of automatic sprinklers on building design, an independent report produced by WSP, sponsored by the Business Sprinkler Alliance (BSA), published in September 2017.
Contents |
Introduction
BS 9999 provides an advanced and flexible approach in building design; it describes a risk-based approach where designers can take into account design benefits such as the inclusion of automatic sprinklers.
Within BS 9999, buildings are rated on their risk to life in the event of a fire by assigning risk profiles to classify the building in terms of occupant characteristics (Table 4-2) and fire growth rates (Table 4-3).
Table 4-2 BS 9999 occupant characteristics
Occupancy characteristic
Description
Examples
A
Occupants who are awake and familiar with the building
Office and industrial premises
B
Occupants who are awake and unfamiliar with the building
Shops, exhibitions, museums, leisure centres, other assembly buildings, etc.
C
Occupants who are likely to be asleep:
Ci [A]
Long-term individual occupancy
Individual flats without 24 h maintenance and management control on site
Cii [A]
Long-term managed occupancy
Serviced flats, halls of residence, sleeping areas of boarding schools
Ciii
Short-term occupancy
D [B]
Occupants receiving medical care
Hospitals, residential care facilities
- [A] Categories Ci and Cii are included for completeness within this table but are covered in more depth in BS 9991.
- [B] Currently occupancy characteristic D, medical care, is dealt with in other documentation and is outside the scope of this British Standard.
Table 4-3 BS 9999 fire growth rates
| Category | Fire growth rate [A] | Fire growth parameter [C] kJ/s³ | Description | Typical examples [B] |
| 1 | Slow | 0.003 | Evenly distributed low level fire load, small discrete packets of fuel or material of limited combustibility [D] | Reception areas, concourses (without concession outlets) and halls with limited fire load such as sports stadia and foyers |
| 2 | Medium | 0.012 | Evenly distributed low to mid-level fire load comprising a mix of combustible materials | Offices, lounges, classrooms, auditoria, seating areas, galleries and car parks [E] |
| 3 | Fast | 0.047 | Stacked combustibles (on or off racking and shelving but excluding high rack storage), some small quantities of materials other than materials of limited combustibility [D] (or where larger quantities are stored in separate fire resisting enclosures), process, manufacturing or storage of combustible materials | Shop sales areas [F], workshops, factories and small storage buildings |
| 4 [G] | Ultra-fast | 0.188 | Medium to large quantities of materials other than materials of limited combustibility[D], high racked storage, flammable liquids and gases or where rapid uncontrolled fire growth could occur | Warehousing [H] processing plants and car parks [E] utilizing a car stacker or similar method where there is no fire separation between stacked cars |
- [A] These categories are related to the fire growth rate and not the ultimate potential fire size.
- [B] These are examples only and may be varied according to the specifics of the building/room contents.
- [C] This is discussed in PD 7974-1.
- [D] Limited combustibility is defined in 3.77 and includes for this purpose materials also defined in 3.85 as non-combustible.
- [E] Includes both open and non-open sided car parks.
- [F] Includes covered shopping complexes and department stores as well as high street shops and premises for personal services, delivery and collection of goods for cleaning/repair/treatment either carried out by staff or by members of the public themselves. Combustibility, quantity and how goods are displayed should also be taken into account and the risk category amended accordingly.
- [G] See Table 4. This category is unacceptable unless a sprinkler system is installed.
- [H] This is a worst case assumption. Combustibility, quantity and the way in which goods (including packaging) are stored should be taken into account and the risk category amended accordingly.
Automatic sprinkler systems can provide an efficient means of fire control within a building compartment. Consequently, the installation of an automatic sprinkler system throughout a building allows the fire growth rates that are determined to be reduced by one category. E.g. an industrial premises containing stacked cardboard boxes and wooden pallets, and occupants who are familiar with the building receives a risk profile of A3. The inclusion of an automatic sprinkler system reduces the risk profile to A2.
The extent of fire safety measures and design features required in a building is proportional to the risk profile. By reducing the risk as a result of installing an automatic sprinkler system, fewer additional safety measures are required.
Where only part of a building contains automatic sprinklers, only the areas that are covered may be subject to a risk category reduction. Corridors and linking spaces from sprinklered rooms should also be covered by sprinklers, or separated by fire resisting construction.
Building layout / means of escape
Reducing the risk profile (by incorporating automatic sprinklers) allows more time for escape by occupants. Consequently longer travel distances (Table 4-4), narrower door widths (Table 4-5) and narrower stair widths (Table 4-6) are allowed to achieve the same level of fire safety.
Table 4-4 BS 9999 maximum permissible travel distances
Travel distance when minimum fire protection measures are provided [A]
Travel distance, in metres (m)
Two-way travel
One-way travel
A1
65
26
A2
55
22
A3
45
18
A4 [B]
Not applicable [B]
Not applicable [B]
B1
60
24
B2
50
20
B3
40
16
B4 [B]
Not applicable [B]
Not applicable [B]
C1
27
13
C2
18
9
C3 [B]
14
7
C4 [B]
Not applicable [B]
Not applicable [B]
Where exact travel distances are not known, direct distances should be taken as two thirds of the travel distance.
E.g. A building rated B3 has a maximum permissible one-way travel distance of 16 m and two-way travel distance of 40 m. The provision of automatic sprinklers reduces the risk profile to B2, allowing one-way travel distances up to 20 m and two-way travel distance up to 50 m.
Table 4-5 BS 9999 Minimum permissible door widths
Door widths when minimum fire protection measures are provided
Minimum door width per person (mm)
A1
3.3
A2
3.6
A3
4.6
A4 [A]
Not applicable [B]
B1
3.6
B2
4.1
B3
6.0
B4 [A]
Not applicable [B]
C1
3.6
C2
4.1
C3 [A]
6.0
C4 [A]
Not applicable [B]
E.g. A building with a risk profile B2 must contain doors with a minimum width of 4.1 mm per person. The installation of automatic sprinklers reduces the risk profile to B1 allowing minimum door widths of 3.6 mm per person.
Table 4-6 BS 9999: minimum permissible stair widths
Door widths when minimum fire protection measures are provided
1 floor
2 floors
3 floors
4 floors
5 floors
6 floors
7 floors
8 floors
9 floors
10+ floors
A1
3.90
3.40
2.95
2.45
2.15
2.00
1.80
1.70
1.50
1.40
A2
4.50
3.80
3.25
2.75
2.45
2.20
2.00
1.90
1.70
1.60
A3
5.40
4.60
4.00
3.50
3.10
2.80
2.60
2.30
2.10
2.00
A4 [A]
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
B1
4.20
3.60
3.10
2.60
2.30
2.10
1.90
1.80
1.60
1.50
B2
4.80
4.00
3.40
2.90
2.60
2.30
2.10
2.00
1.80
1.70
B3
7.00
6.00
5.30
4.60
4.20
3.70
3.40
3.10
2.80
2.60
B4 [A]
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
C1
4.20
3.60
3.10
2.60
2.30
2.10
1.90
1.80
1.60
1.50
C2
4.80
4.00
3.40
2.90
2.60
2.30
2.10
2.00
1.80
1.70
C3 [A]
7.00
6.00
5.30
4.60
4.20
3.70
3.40
3.10
2.80
2.60
C4 [A]
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
E.g. a two-storey building in planning is to have a risk profile of A2, but the designers decide to include an automatic sprinkler system throughout. The risk profile is reduced to A1, either allowing an increase in the number of occupants permitted to use the stair or a reduction in the overall stair size (from 3.8mm/person to 3.4mm/person). The impact of this on a scheme will vary case-by- case.
Where two or more stairways are provided, it should be assumed that one of them might not be available due to fire or smoke and must be discounted unless:
- The stairs are protected by a lobby; or
- The stairs are protected by a smoke control system designed in accordance with BS EN 12101-6; or
- Automatic sprinklers are installed throughout the building.
For phased evacuation, two floors are used for the stair width calculations; the following table compares the improvements for different risk profiles:
Table 4-7 Impact of sprinklers on the variation of stair widths in BS 9999
Min. stair width factor (2 floors) [mm/ppl]
Reduction [%]
Non- Sprinklered
Sprinklered
A2: Offices
3.80
3.40
11%
A3: Teaching Labs
4.60
3.80
17%
B2: Restaurants
4.00
3.60
10%
B3: Libraries
6.00
4.00
33%
C2: Hotels
4.00
3.60
10%
For example; a seven-storey office building (risk profile A2) with open-plan area of 1,200m² per floor (200 ppl/floor).
- Non-sprinklered – Simultaneous evacuation strategy: the minimum width of the stairs would be 1,200ppl x 2.2mm = 2,640mm
- Sprinklered – The risk profile reduces to A1. Simultaneous evacuation strategy: the minimum width of the stairs would be 1200ppl x 2.0mm = 2,400mm.
- A reduction of 9% (240mm) in the width of stair is achieved when sprinklered. If multiplied by 10m (typical staircase length per storey) this gives an additional 2.4m²/floor of useable floor space.
Another example is a six-storey library building (risk profile B3) with floor area of 1,²400m per floor (200 ppl/floor).
- Non-sprinklered – Simultaneous evacuation strategy: the minimum width of the stairs would be 1,000ppl x 4.2mm = 4,200mm.
- Sprinklered – The risk profile reduces to B2. Simultaneous evacuation strategy: the minimum width of the stairs would be 1,000ppl x 2.6mm = 2,600mm.
- A reduction of 38% (1,600mm) in the width of stair is achieved when sprinklered. If multiplied by 10m (typical staircase length per storey) this gives an additional 16m²/floor of useable floor space.
Fire fighting access
BS 9999 provides the same concession as ADB in regards to the impact of providing automatic sprinklers on the number of firefighting shafts and basement smoke ventilation discussed earlier (see Design benefits of automatic sprinkler systems granted under approved document B.)
Passive structural fire protection
Elements of structure should have a minimum period of fire resistance to maintain the integrity and insulation of the building so that occupants can escape. The resistance required depends on the risk profile of the building but principally provides the same guidance as ADB.
Fire spread and compartmentation
BS 99994 states that radiation emitted from a building is halved by the action of automatic sprinklers and allows separation distances to be halved and unprotected areas to be doubled if automatic sprinklers are installed.
Compartments should be limited in size according to the risk profile of the building (Table 4-8). The provision of automatic sprinklers reduces the risk profile by one category and reduces the limits on compartment sizes.
Table 4-8 BS 9999 – maximum permissible building height and floor area
Maximum dimensions of compartments
Single storey
Maximum floor area m²
A1
No limit
No limit
No limit
A2
No limit
<30 greater than or equal to 30
No limit 4,000
A3
No limit
<18 18 to 30 greater than or equal to 30
14,000 4,000 Not acceptable
A4 [A]
Not applicable [A]
Not applicable [A]
Not applicable [A]
B1
No limit
No limit
No limit
B2
No limit
<18 No limit
8,000 4,000
B3
2,000
<30 greater than or equal to 30
2,000 Not acceptable
B4 [A]
Not applicable [A]
Not applicable [A]
Not applicable [A]
C1
No limit
No limit
No limit
C2
No limit
No limit
No limit
C3 [B]
No limit
Not applicable
Not applicable
C4 [A]
Not applicable [A]
Not applicable [A]
Not applicable [A]
- [A] These categories are outside the scope of the standard.
- [B] Risk profile C3 is unacceptable under many circumstances unless special precautions are taken.
References
[4] For larger buildings BR187 External fire spread: building separation and boundary distances provides more detailed guidance.
This article was originally published as part of The impact of automatic sprinklers on building design, an independent report produced by WSP, sponsored by the Business Sprinkler Alliance(BSA), published in September 2017.
Related articles on Designing Buildings
- Automatic fire sprinkler systems: A good practice guide.
- Automatic sprinkler system design and operation.
- Business Sprinkler Alliance.
- Case study A for offices to show where automatic sprinklers have the greatest impact.
- Case study B for offices to show where automatic sprinklers have the greatest impact.
- Costs of water automatic sprinkler systems.
- Design benefits of automatic sprinkler systems granted under approved document B.
- Drenchers.
- Fire detection and alarm system.
- Fire detector.
- Fire in buildings.
- Fire protection engineering.
- Fire safety design.
- Overview of automatic sprinkler system design and operation
- Sprinkler systems explained: A guide to sprinkler installation standards and rules.
- Sprinklers.
- The cost efficiency of different combinations of fire protection measures.
- The impact of automatic sprinklers on building design.
- Watermist systems for fire protection in domestic and residential buildings DG 534.
Featured articles and news
Twas the site before Christmas...
A rhyme for the industry and a thankyou to our supporters.
Plumbing and heating systems in schools
New apprentice pay rates coming into effect in the new year
Addressing the impact of recent national minimum wage changes.
EBSSA support for the new industry competence structure
The Engineering and Building Services Skills Authority, in working group 2.
Notes from BSRIA Sustainable Futures briefing
From carbon down to the all important customer: Redefining Retrofit for Net Zero Living.
Principal Designer: A New Opportunity for Architects
ACA launches a Principal Designer Register for architects.
A new government plan for housing and nature recovery
Exploring a new housing and infrastructure nature recovery framework.
Leveraging technology to enhance prospects for students
A case study on the significance of the Autodesk Revit certification.
Fundamental Review of Building Regulations Guidance
Announced during commons debate on the Grenfell Inquiry Phase 2 report.
CIAT responds to the updated National Planning Policy Framework
With key changes in the revised NPPF outlined.
Councils and communities highlighted for delivery of common-sense housing in planning overhaul
As government follows up with mandatory housing targets.
CIOB photographic competition final images revealed
Art of Building produces stunning images for another year.
HSE prosecutes company for putting workers at risk
Roofing company fined and its director sentenced.
Strategic restructure to transform industry competence
EBSSA becomes part of a new industry competence structure.
Major overhaul of planning committees proposed by government
Planning decisions set to be fast-tracked to tackle the housing crisis.
Industry Competence Steering Group restructure
ICSG transitions to the Industry Competence Committee (ICC) under the Building Safety Regulator (BSR).
Principal Contractor Competency Certification Scheme
CIOB PCCCS competence framework for Principal Contractors.
The CIAT Principal Designer register
Issues explained via a series of FAQs.